The Biplane Period, 1917 to 1932
Page 7
Landing speed, while not tactically significant, is included in the specifications because it is a measure of relative safety, and is one of the earliest limiting points selected in the design of an aircraft. The faster the necessary landing speed, the more difficult the landing. Landing speed depends on wing loading and the lifting efficiency
of the wing. Stalling speed, at which the airplane stalls, is the minimum speed of flight, and is often cited in tables instead of landing speed.
A designer begins his task with a proposed specification that gives the armament and performance required. Traditional design procedure began with an estimate of weight, as this is the prime limiting factor of aircraft. A list of the essential parts of the useful load is totaled, including crew, armament, equipment, and probable fuel required. This is added to a rough estimate, from past experience, of the engine and airframe weight required to support such
a load. Useful load and empty weight are added to make estimated gross weight.
An appropriate wing section and form is then selected; a high-lift airfoil profile for a bomber, or a low-drag airfoil for the fighter. Aspect ratio (the ratio of the wing span to the mean wing chord) is decided upon; a high aspect ratio for a long-range machine like the B-29, or a short, stubby wing for an interceptor.
American World War I aircraft used the thin airfoil profiles developed in Britain and France by the Royal Aircraft Factory and Eiffel laboratories. But while such thin wings had less drag, they required bracing by outside struts and wires. Germany, however, often favored the thick airfoils developed at the Goettingen wind tunnel. On planes like the Fokker D VII, they provided higher lift without much more drag. Most important was that thicker wings allowed a stronger internal structure, even a cantilever beam supported at one end only, without external struts.
The Clark Y airfoil appeared in 1923, and used on most Curtiss and Douglas warplanes, combined the Goettingen profile with a flat undersurface for easier manufacturing. By 1933, the Variable-Density wind tunnel at Langley Field enabled the NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics) to develop a family of 78 airfoil profiles of different qualities. World War II aircraft especially used the 230 series.
Once the airfoil and aspect ratio have been chosen, designers must determine what wing loading would permit the desired landing speed and desired flight qualities. Then the necessary wing area is given by dividing the gross weight by the wing loading. Lift-increasing devices such as landing flaps and wing slots can be added to reduce the wing area without raising the landing speed. The introduction of tricycle landing gear on combat planes in 1939 made feasible higher landing speeds, since the nose wheel permits more sudden stops. However, wing loading should not be increased to a point too detrimental to climb and maneuverability.
When the weight has been estimated, the wing chosen, and the general layout planned, the performance of aircraft depends on its power loading. This leads to the next problem: the selection of a power plant.
Power Plants
To a designer the important features of an airplane engine are its power, weight, size, arrangement and number of cylinders, and the method of cooling. The reader should notice what the official designation tells about an engine. Allison’s V-1710 has an inline Vee cylinder arrangement, and an approximate engine displacement of 1,710 cubic inches, while Wright’s R-2600 is a radial of some 2,600 cubic inch engine displacement.
A piston engine’s power is rated in horsepower available for takeoff, and at a rated altitude. Jet (gas turbine) engines are rated by pounds of static thrust.
[ B- 24 / Home ]
[Back] [Continue to next page]

Want information on other Combat Planes? Search the rest of our site.
© Copyright 2010 AmericanCombatPlanes.com All rights
reserved.
|